Unless you spent the day enjoying complete sensory deprivation you’ll be aware that Steve Jobs announced the new iPhone 4 today at Apple’s WWDC. As someone who’s spent the past 6 months using an iPhone 3GS that I managed to drop in the toilet barely 2 hours after it was first switched on, I’ll likely be first in line on June 24th for an upgrade.
This post isn’t about the new iPhone. Instead it’s about the video announcing the new iPhone on the Apple homepage.
This is a really unfair post. Razorfish just published their 2010 Outlook Report. I think it’s a disappointment and I’m going to tell you why. So why is that unfair? Because they took the time and energy to write it and I didn’t. Instead I’m going to sit on the sidelines and carp.
So first off some deserved props. Razorfish should be applauded for publishing the report each year. It’s always a well-written, nicely art directed piece, and comprehensive as these things go. It’s also become a bit of an ‘event’ in the space. Presumably their clients like it too – it’s nice to know your agency is a widely acknowledged thought-leader in the digital space. And….that’s it.
Doc Searls (he of Cluetrain Manifesto fame) has a great post up called Reputation vs Branding. His premise is that the idea of branding is dead and that what’s really important is the sum total of a company’s reputation, established over years, and held in the minds of customers.
I completely agree.
Branding was a useful tool for an age where marketers needed a device to represent all the hooks and aspirations they were trying to communicate through command and control marketing and advertising. Those days are over (which is different from saying traditional media is dead).
The reality now is that consumers and customers are now creators and sharers of opinion about every company under the sun, and they have access to a virtual ocean of information from which to make smart decisions about which companies they trust and which ones they wouldn’t be seen dead supporting.
This democratization of information means that companies are now judged by consumers not simply for the quality and relevance of the products and services they bring to market, but a whole load of other things too which fall way outside the scope of a traditional ‘brand’. It doesn’t matter very much whether company x’s new widget is the best on the market and that they have great customer service if it was developed in an Asian sweatshop and caused massive pollution to develop. # fail.
To my mind companies that think in terms of ‘brand’ rather that ‘reputation’ are probably living on past successes rather than thinking about future evolution and market opportunity. They’re also less likely to be driven by a galvanizing mission, less likely to be innovative and certainly less likely to engender confidence and positivity among consumers.
A recent Alterian study has trust in advertising hovering around 5%. That’s what people think of brands these days.
Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide (Jeez you’d think these guys would have learned a bit about crisis management by now) still has a very pretty blurb on its website about the work it did back in 1999 to help rebrand the oil company BP.
Quote: “Our recommendation was to position BP as a new type of global energy company — one that confronts difficult issues like the conflict between energy and environmental needs and takes action beyond what is expected”.
Which makes it sound, possibly erroneously, definitely hubristically, that the whole idea of creating the Beyond Petroleum ‘brand’ for BP (this went way beyond a tagline) was invented at Ogilvy. In other words this very wonderful idea didn’t come from inside BP. Of course this could be wrong. Lots of agencies boast of things that are untrue, partially true or at least un-proveable. Allegedly.
As customers and consumers become more active in social media, they’re gaining access to the wealth of constantly evolving information that resides on the web and increasingly contributing their own knowledge of brands, products and services. At the same time millions of businesses – big and small – are dipping their toes in social and trying to figure out a) how best to mine the customer insight they find there and b) testing the water with various initiatives that typically fall into three categories:
1) Social network activity (Tweeting, FB fan page, etc)
2) Blogging and/or influencer programs
3) Customer community development and management
All of which is great. But it’s also only one side of the social media coin. Outbound activity that focuses on engaging more effectively with customers in social is important. But embracing social insights in order to change the internal culture and processes of a business is even more so. Much more so. And much harder.
Crowdsourcing and co-creation are two major buzzwords in social media circles and for good reason. The network effect of social enables companies to engage with consumers and customers in ways that might radically accelerate innovation and creativity – and drive WOM, loyalty, market-share and profit in the bargain.
Lots of experiments are taking place and the jury is still out. But recently an article in Businessweek caught my eye as an example of co-creation done right. Unilever, working with Face, a London agency that specializes in co-creation, assembled a team of 16 young adults from around the world at their New York offices. Their task: to develop a new fragrance for Axe, Unilever’s hugely successful deodorant brand for young men that addressed the need for ‘freshness’.
The team recommended a fragrance that changed during the day, naming it ‘Twist’ (typically inappropriate ad here). The concept was run through – and given a thumbs up by – Face’s ‘Headbox’ community of young men and was launched successfully late last year.
One of the core beliefs that underpin Understand And Serve is the need for companies to stand for something that transcends the usual corporate mission of maximizing profit. Previously we’ve talked about a bunch of companies that fall into that category including Apple and USAA.
We live in a world where people now seek out brands that meet their worldview as well as providing great, relevant products and services. They look for brands that behave ethically and sustainably, that treat their employees and suppliers well, and whose philanthropic instincts and activities match their own.
But more than that, people are moved by companies whose vision encompasses a clear passion for the sector they serve and the consumer solutions they provide. Allstate comes to mind with their powerful “That’s Allstate’s Stand” stake-in-the-ground approach. A smaller example is Hagerty Insurance based in Traverse City Michigan. If you don’t own a classic car you won’t have heard of them, but if you do you’ll almost certainly be insured by them and know all about the leadership and advocacy role they play in the classic car hobby.
These four great companies stand for something that’s greater than the profit motive. It’s a powerful differentiator. It also (helpfully) gives them permission to tell stories. Stories that can be passionately and compellingly told. That people are captivated by. That they want to read and share with others. In other words, the kind of stories that power the social web.
I was intrigued by a post on the always excellent Edward Boches blog. Edward attended the recent SXSW interactive conference in Austin and asked a number of digirati for their impressions of the festival. Two back-to-back comments on the state of social media stood out.
“We need to be doing something interesting if we’re to share it”.
“Social media is boring until we do something innovative with it”.
Far too many companies and agencies continue to be engaged in social for the sake of it. Far too few understand the importance of storytelling – and therefore the need to have interesting stories to tell in the first place.
And this is extremely important. People are using the web to make decisions about what to buy. They’re looking for reasons to choose. Apple, Allstate, USAA and Hagerty know what to give them. It used to be called ‘reasons to believe’. Actually that still sounds pretty good.
Lesson to companies and social agencies. Social is meaningless without great content. People want to hear from you. You better have stories to tell.
If that’s a consumer asking the question they might have to wait a while for a reply at least according to a recent Alterian survey of marketers Are You Ready To Engage? Amazingly, barely 1/3rd of companies surveyed indicated they intend to listen to consumers by investing in social media monitoring in 2010 (see below). The same survey also reported that 66% of marketers intend to invest in some sort of social media engagement activity in 2010.
Last week Sir Martin Sorrell gave an interview in the WSJ India. In it he discussed his thoughts and attitudes towards social media. Money quote:
“… [social media is] not a medium that really lends itself to commercial exploitation…The more you try and invade it with commercial messages, the more at risk you are.”
On its face of course this statement is correct. Despite the most fervent desires of their owners, consumers have resolutely rejected the idea of receiving commercial messages within social networks.
Strategy sets direction in which a company wants to go. The key is to develop a strategy that accounts for consumer and competitive realities and then communicate it to all stakeholders. It can be formal or informal, very detailed or simple, but without some sense for who you are and what you are providing as differentiated value in the marketplace, companies inevitably lose their way and advantage in the marketplace. Strategy is essential.
As the economy continues its struggle out of recession, there is a wide call for new strategies that will drive top-line growth. Couldn’t agree more. Strategists, academics, bloggers have all opined that you can’t cost-cut your way to growth. No argument. But in these skinny-times let’s not overlook another constructive argument for strategy: Strategy Saves Money. And by that I mean it preserves resources that would otherwise be wasted and have no real impact.
Understand & Serve is a business and marketing consultancy. We provide research, planning, digital, social media and analytics solutions to companies and marketing agencies. The web has revolutionized the way people research brands, products and services. Our mission is to help marketers navigate this new world and improve three key business metrics: awareness, consideration and sales.
more →
4 Reasons To Love The Amazing Apple iPhone4…video! http://bit.ly/cVuTDN - posted on 07/06/2010 22:38:19
Great debate going on at Creativity Unbound RT @edwardboches A brand is what a brand does | Creativity_Unbound http://bit.ly/cuJ8pB - posted on 27/05/2010 13:13:06
Good thinking about site redesigns http://shar.es/mjVzP - posted on 27/05/2010 12:25:37